Center for American Progress Action Fund Center for American Progress Action Fund

The Right’s Race-Baiting Assault on Sotomayor

sotomayor with hand raised SOURCE: AP/George Bridges

Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor is sworn in on Capitol Hill during her confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Senator Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III has a long history of questionable statements about race. He once quipped that he “used to think [the KKK] were OK” until he found out some of them were “pot smokers.” He routinely referred to an African-American attorney who worked for him as “boy,” and he once warned that attorney to “be careful what you say to white folks” after Sessions overheard him chastising a white secretary. Today, at Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s confirmation hearing, Sessions wondered aloud how Sotomayor could have voted differently than another judge of “Puerto Rican ancestry.”

So it is very odd that conservatives would choose Sessions as their point person on the Sotomayor nomination. At best this choice is laughably tone deaf. At worst it shows that Senate conservatives wholeheartedly embrace Sessions’ views on race.

It is crystal clear, however, that Sessions is the architect of the conservative strategy against Sotomayor. In a campaign that echoes Lee Atwater’s infamous Willie Horton ad and Jesse Helms’ “white hands” ad, today’s attacks on Sotomayor have focused almost exclusively on race. Nevermind that conservatives have only uncovered one case in Sotomayor’s record, Ricci v. DeStefano, which supposedly supports their claim that Sotomayor is biased against white men. And nevermind that Sotomayor simply followed a 1984 precedent which is nearly identical to Ricci when she decided that case. Apparently conservatives believe the facts must take a backseat to race-baiting.

There is no doubt that the American people will reject this antiquated strategy, just like the Senate rejected Sessions’ nomination to the federal bench in 1986. Twenty-three years later, conservatives are still living in the past.

Ian Millhiser is a Legal Research Analyst at American Progress.

See also:

To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:

Print: Katie Peters (economy, education, and health care)
202.741.6285 or kpeters1@americanprogressaction.org

Print: Christina DiPasquale (foreign policy and security, energy)
202.481.8181 or cdipasquale@americanprogressaction.org

Print: Laura Pereyra (ethnic media, immigration)
202.741.6258 or lpereyra@americanprogressaction.org

Radio: Anne Shoup
202.481.7146 or ashoup@americanprogressaction.org

TV: Lindsay Hamilton
202.483.2675 or lhamilton@americanprogressaction.org

Web: Andrea Peterson
202.481.8119 or apeterson@americanprogressaction.org

Subscribe to RSS Feeds

RSS Icon Action Fund RSS Feeds

Related Materials

Who Will Republicans Choose When It Comes to the Nation's Courts?, by April Carson

The Goodwin Liu Nomination: Impaired Judgment, by Ian Millhiser

Disqualifying Excellence, by Ian Millhiser

Déjà Vu All Over Again, by Ian Millhiser

The Tyranny of the Timepiece, by Ian Millhiser

Also by Ian Millhiser

Words Still Matter, Even in the Supreme Court, November 14, 2011 Center for American Progress

What If the Tea Party Wins?, September 16, 2011 Center for American Progress

The Eleventh Circuit’s Affordable Care Act Decision Cannot Be Squared With The Constitution, August 15, 2011 Center for American Progress